PHIL 111-IntroCritical Thinking Snhu Full Course-Download

Course Assignment List

• PHIL 111 1-1Discussion Introduction to Critical Thinking

• PHIL 111 1-2 Journal Barriers to Critical Thinking

• PHIL 111 2-1 Discussion Foundations of Logic and Reasoning

• PHIL 111 2-2 Journal Final Project Topic MARIJUANA BENEFICIAL OR HARMFUL

• PHIL 111 3-1 Discussion Credibility in the Media

• PHIL 111 3-2 Milestone One Primary Argument

• PHIL 111 4-1 Discussion Assess Your Final Project Article

• PHIL 111 4-2 Journal Effects of Bias

• PHIL 111 5-1 Discussion Informal Fallacies

• PHIL 111 5-2 Milestone Two Counterargument

• PHIL 111 6-1 Discussion Using Critical Thinking to Recognize Astroturfing and False Advertising

• PHIL 111 6-2 Journal Misinformation and Personal Responsibility

• PHIL 111 7-1 Final Project Critical Essay

• PHIL 111 7-2 Discussion Assistance With the Critical Essay (Optional)

• PHIL 111 8-1 Discussion Dealing With Personal Bias

• PHIL 111 Milestone One Primary Argument

• PHIL 111 PHL-111-Syllabus Intro to Critical Thinking- SNHU

Brief Descriptions with Course Codes

Course Framework & Foundational Thinking

• PHIL 111 PHL-111-Syllabus Intro to Critical Thinking- SNHU: The fundamental blueprint for PHIL 111 at Southern New Hampshire University, mapping out grading metrics, expectations, and the progressive scaffolding of the critical essay project.

• PHIL 111 1-1Discussion Introduction to Critical Thinking: An introductory collaborative forum in PHIL 111 where students define the core tenets of objective analysis and separate basic thoughts from structured arguments.

• PHIL 111 1-2 Journal Barriers to Critical Thinking: A reflective tracking assignment in PHIL 111 examining psychological, cultural, and cognitive hurdles that cloud raw decision-making.

Logic, Reasoning & Topic Selection

• PHIL 111 2-1 Discussion Foundations of Logic and Reasoning: A peer discussion workspace in PHIL 111 exploring deductive and inductive logic, structure, validity, and the soundness of everyday premises.

• PHIL 111 2-2 Journal Final Project Topic MARIJUANA BENEFICIAL OR HARMFUL: A thematic exploration journal in PHIL 111 where students select their specific lane of inquiry surrounding the medical, economic, or social impacts of cannabis to spark their term-long critical analysis.

Media Metrics & Argument Construction (Milestone One)

• PHIL 111 3-1 Discussion Credibility in the Media: A modern analytical forum in PHIL 111 detailing methods for checking source authority, uncovering sensationalism, and spotting reliable reporting.

• PHIL 111 3-2 Milestone One Primary Argument & PHIL 111 Milestone One Primary Argument: The first major building block assignment for the PHIL 111 capstone, requiring students to formalize their core thesis statements and document their primary lines of reasoning.

Bias Analysis & Deconstruction

• PHIL 111 4-1 Discussion Assess Your Final Project Article: An analytical evaluation assignment in PHIL 111 where students dissect their chosen research material for logic gaps and authoritative value.

• PHIL 111 4-2 Journal Effects of Bias: An inner-reflection exercise in PHIL 111 isolating how confirmation bias and personal paradigms can distort objective research data processing.

Fallacies & Counterarguments (Milestone Two)

• PHIL 111 5-1 Discussion Informal Fallacies: A diagnostic discussion module in PHIL 111 identifying standard logic traps like ad hominem attacks, strawman configurations, and slippery slope fallacies.

• PHIL 111 5-2 Milestone Two Counterargument: The second milestone submission for the PHIL 111 capstone paper, challenging students to anticipate opposing viewpoints, analyze alternative logic, and construct structured rebuttals.

Deception, Misinformation & Final Writing

• PHIL 111 6-1 Discussion Using Critical Thinking to Recognize Astroturfing and False Advertising: A real-world application laboratory in PHIL 111 breaking down artificial grassroots operations, hidden corporate agendas, and deceptive commercial claims.

• PHIL 111 6-2 Journal Misinformation and Personal Responsibility: An ethical accountability module in PHIL 111 evaluating consumer obligations in verifying facts before validating or sharing digital media.

• PHIL 111 7-1 Final Project Critical Essay: The terminal master assignment in PHIL 111 at Southern New Hampshire University, merging primary arguments, counter-evidence, and objective logic loops into a polished, persuasive essay.

• PHIL 111 7-2 Discussion Assistance With the Critical Essay (Optional): A peer troubleshooting workbench in PHIL 111 designed for final draft editing, rubric alignment checks, and collaborative critique.

• PHIL 111 8-1 Discussion Dealing With Personal Bias: A capstone reflective discussion module in PHIL 111 summarizing long-term strategies to keep personal assumptions separated from intellectual analysis beyond the classroom.